Civil Disobedience Movement India Essays

Civil Disobedience Movement

Introduction: The Civil disobedience movement was an important part of Indian freedom movement. It was led by Mahatma Gandhi against certain laws and commands of the ruling British Government.

Who started the Civil disobedience movement? In India, the Civil disobedience movement was started by Mahatma Gandhi.

Why Gandhi started Civil disobedience movement? In March 1930, Gandhiji wrote in the newspaper, Young India, that he might suspend his civil disobedience or law-breaking movement if the government accepted his eleven-point demands. But Lord Irwin’s government did not respond. So, Gandhiji started the Civil Disobedience Movement.

When was Civil disobedience movement started? It was started with Dandi March (also Salt march, Salt satyagraha) by Mahatma Gandhi on 12th March, 1930. On 12 March, 1930 he along with his 78 followers began a march from the Sabarmati Ashram to “Dandi” on the Gujarat coast. It was a distance of 200 miles. At Dandi a few day s later they violated the salt laws by making salt from sea-water. Thus, began the civil disobedience Movement.

What was the importance of Dandi March (Salt Satyagraha)? The Dandi March aroused great enthusiasm among the people. Everywhere the people began to break the law by selling banned political pamphlets, by showing defiance of section 144 and by with holding rents. Gandhiji called upon the women to begin spinning. In response to his call women took to spinning they also started picketing at the door of Government offices and foreign-goods shops. This participation of the women was a new thing in the freedom struggle. The movement was very tense in Bengal and the north-west. Sarojini Naidu came to the forefront during this movement. In the north-west the most famous leader was Abdul Gaffar Khan, knick-named as “Frontier Gandhi”.

Gandhi-Irwin Pact: The Government had called a round Table conference in 1930 in London. The congress did not join it. In order to make sure that the congress would participate in the second conference, Lord Irwin made a pact with Gandhiji in 1931. In this “Gandhi-Irwin Pact” the Government agreed to let off all political prisoners and to cancel the oppressive laws. The Second Round Table Conference was a failure from India’s point of view. Gandhiji’s demand for full self-government was rejected.

Communal Award: Then on 17 August 1932 came that infamous “Communal Award” of Ramsay MacDonald, the British Prime Minister. By it Muslims, Sikhs and the Hindu scheduled castes were to vote separately. Actually this step was taken to destroy the national unity. Gandhiji strongly opposed it. He went on to fast till death in the prison. Ultimately, caste Hindus and the scheduled caste Hindus were united by the “Pact of Poona” in 1932 under the leadership of Dr. Ambedkar. Meanwhile it was clear to both Gandhiji and the other leaders that the Civil Disobedience Movement was losing its force. So in 19354 Gandhiji called off the movement.

Conclusion: The Civil Disobedience Movement was not successful. But it prepared the people of India for great sacrifice. It was a good training for the people. Unlike the Non-cooperation Movement, the Civil Disobedience Movement increased the popularity of the Congress.

Category: Modern History of IndiaTagged With: Freedom Movements

Essay On Gandhi's Civil Disobedience


Michelle Gu


Civil Disobedience - Salt March

Salt March is a major nonviolent action in India led by Mohandas K. Gandhi from March to April in 1930. The march was the first act in an ever-larger campaign of civil disobedience. It was proposed by Gandhi and waged to go against British rule of Salt Tax in India that extended into early 1931.

Salt production and contribution in India had been a complete British monopoly after the British government prohibited Indians to sell or produce salt. The British government forced people to buy heavily taxed and expensive salt that was imported from Britain. It infuriated poor people who couldn't afford to pay it. Gandhi's defiance of British colonial laws over the empire's salt monopoly, beginning in March 1930, sparked a wave of civil disobedience to expel the British Empire. Gandhi and his supporters began an expanding march to produce salt and transport it without paying the tax. The British suppressed the march fiercely, arresting tens of thousands, and refused to make any concessions. However, Indians won the independence war with the means of nonviolence. So, the campaign was a valid practice of civil disobedience for three reasons.

First of all, nonviolence applied in this campaign has a powerful outcome while the British use violence, which inflamed Indians and the world. Nonviolence, when met by violence, worked by mobilizing the masses since the Indian population was divided by gender, caste, class and religion, making it quite a challenge to mobilize support for any campaign. The march went from village to village providing opportunities to make public statements of protest and to recruit people into the movement. The making of salt from the Indian Ocean transgressing British law led to widespread arrests and beatings imposed by British troops. While British officials found that massive arrests were unable to slow the movement, they arrested Gandhi with the belief that it would stop the campaign. Adversely, more participants joined the movement with a nonviolent invasion of the Dharasana Salt Works, which resulted in horrible violence. The non-violent satyagrahis did not defend themselves against the policemen, and many were heavily beaten and even killed instantly. Their suffering gained the attention of media worldwide. The violence against unarmed protesters made Britain lose its supporters in England. In order to regain their credit, Gandhi was invited to London to negotiate with government officials about Indian independence. So with nonviolent revolt, Gandhi succeeded in giving rise to widespread dissatisfaction with British officials and their unfair laws among Indian people. However, if they used violence like British officials did, they...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Essay on the important role harriet beecher stowe played in the civil war

571 words - 2 pages HARRIET BEECHER STOWEHarriet Beecher Stowe played a very significant role in the civil war. Many people today still agree that Harriet Beecher Stowes novel "Uncle Tom's Cabin" was one of the reasons for starting the civil war. Even before Harriet Beecher Stowe's book was released many northerners were...

this essay is on the times leading to the civil war

739 words - 3 pages In my eyes the civil war was inevitable. At a time when a nation split into two and each differing so greatly there is no question that all roads lead to war. From slavery to the social, economic, and political points of view, dating from colonial times, everythin gradually drove the two sections farther and farther apart, and closer and closer to war.Before the

Thorough analysis and response essay on "Civil Peace" by Chinua Achebe.

1720 words - 7 pages Civil Peace. One rarely hears those two words together. It is usually either Civil War, or perhaps Civil Chaos, but rarely is it Civil Peace. This is because it is not the times of peace that are remembered, but the times of war. It is during these times that people truly shine as the need arises or are exposed for their truer, more evil selves. Like Jamie Sullivan said...

A biography on Gandhi.

2409 words - 10 pages Although short in stature, he stood for towering ideals, among them political liberty, social justice, and religious tolerance. "In an age of empire and military might," writes Johanna McGeary of TIME magazine, "he proved that the powerless had power and that force of arms would not forever prevail against force of spirit" (McGeary 1). His full name was

Civil Disobedience

1719 words - 7 pages All throughout world history, human beings have participated in acts of civil disobedience. However, in the last two centuries the belief and practice of it has been in full swing and has even brought on major historical events, especially concerning equal rights and just laws. Three major firm believers and activists in civil disobedience were Henry David Thoreau, Martin Luther King Jr., and Gandhi. All three of these men participated in...

Evaluation of Dworkin's and Habermas's Approach to Civil Disobedience

1608 words - 6 pages Evaluation of Dworkin's and Habermas's Approach to Civil Disobedience The following essay will attempt to evaluate the approach taken by Dworkin and Habermas on their views of civil disobedience. The two main pieces of literature referred to will be Dworkin?s paper on 'Civil Disobedience and Nuclear Protest?' and Habermas's paper on 'Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State.' An outline of both Dworkin's and...

This essay is about Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and what he accomplished. It shows how he was a great leader and a heroe.

809 words - 3 pages Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi is one of the most remembered and respected peace heroes of the 20th Century. During Gandhi's years of working in India and South Africa, he went through humiliating experiences of racial discrimination that propelled him to take a stand. Gandhi's heroic struggles in life set the stage for people like myself to...

Mahatma Gandhi “Great Soul”

1009 words - 4 pages MAHATMA GANDHI “GREAT SOUL” Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi is considered to be the Twentieth Century’s modern day Messiah. He was born of a modest middle class family from India and educated in law from the aristocratic society of London, England. Mahatma Gandhi was the paramount leader for Indian nationalism in British-ruled India who exercised non-violent civil disobedience and led India to independence and inspired movements for civil rights and...


509 words - 2 pages Lloyd 1Cory Lloyd Period 1 WHH 7 April 2014 Gandhi Mohandis K. Gandhi is one of the most remembered leader ever. The main reason he is remembered is because of his peaceful tactics which influenced many future leaders. These leaders used his tactics and even quoted him in difficult times to show that peacefulness will work. The most well recognized man that was influenced by Gandhi was Martin Luther King Jr. Over...

Independence Of India and Martin Luther King

1247 words - 5 pages Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869 at Porbandar located in Gujarat and was assassinated on January 30, 1948. Mahatma Gandhi was the superior leader and revolutionist of Indian nationalism in British-ruled India. He led Republic of India to autonomy and galvanized movements for civil rights and independence across the globe. Just like other revolutionist in history, Gandhi took his time to evolve and advanced his techniques to...


1068 words - 4 pages British being a very strong nation, starting in the 1700's because of the Industrial Revolution was seeking to dominate as many countries it could, politically, economically, and socially and make it a British Imperial colony. India was a great country for Britain to have as one of its colonies because India had 300 million people at that time and were a big potential market for British-made goods. India was also a major supplier in raw...


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *